Adherence beats macros
- The cleanest trial
DIETFITS (2018) randomised 609 adults to a healthy low-fat or healthy low-carb diet for a year, both coached toward whole foods. Result: −5.3 kg vs −6.0 kg — not a significant difference. It had pre-registered that a gene pattern and insulin level would predict who did best on which diet. Neither did. Individual results ranged from −30 kg to +10 kg within both arms, driven by adherence, not assignment.
- The meta-analyses agree
Pooled across dozens of trials, low-carb vs low-fat differ by roughly ~1 kg at 12 months — clinically trivial next to the 5–10 kg swings adherence produces. The 2007 A-TO-Z trial gave Atkins a modest early edge over the weakest comparator, but that edge largely vanished once diet quality was equalised. The honest headline: pick a high-quality pattern you can sustain. Evidence ●●●●●