How it was built
- The approach
Every load-bearing number comes from a named guideline, trial, meta-analysis or regulatory document, with the evidence dots (●●●●● = strong and replicated, down to ○○○○○ = essentially unproven) reflecting study design, size and replication. Figures are group averages; individuals vary widely. Doses and thresholds are typical adult figures from the literature, not instructions.
- The key sources
Plaque biology & regression: the response-to-retention model and the IVUS regression/stabilisation trials (REVERSAL, ASTEROID, SATURN, GLAGOV, HUYGENS, PACMAN-AMI). Causality: Mendelian-randomisation studies, the CTT meta-analyses, and the EAS ApoB/LDL causal consensus. Tests & targets: the ApoB and Lp(a) consensus statements and the lipid-guideline target tables. Imaging: MESA (calcium percentiles and the power of zero), SCOT-HEART (CT angiography), and Cleerly's validation literature. Statins — both sides: the CTT collaboration for benefit, SAMSON and StatinWISE for the nocebo effect, and the BMJ overtreatment critiques. Non-statins: IMPROVE-IT (ezetimibe), CLEAR Outcomes (bempedoic acid), FOURIER/ODYSSEY/GLAGOV (PCSK9), and the ORION programme (inclisiran). Lp(a) & pipeline: the pelacarsen and olpasiran trials, obicetrapib, oral PCSK9 (enlicitide), and the VERVE gene-editing programmes. Lifestyle: PREDIMED, the Portfolio Diet, and SELECT (semaglutide). Supplements: the NCCIH natural-products reviews, REDUCE-IT vs. STRENGTH, HPS2-THRIVE (niacin), and the nattokinase trials (Ren 2017 vs. the placebo-controlled NAPS).